Gisborne Boys’ High School announced a ban on “extravagant and unusual” haircuts, which included dreadlocks. Photo / 123rf
A Gisborne school’s ban on dreadlocks and braids has been labelled “straight racist” by a local woman, who plans to lodge a complaint with the Human Rights Commission.
The ban was announced by Gisborne Boys’ High School principal Tom Cairns this week, as part of a “blitz” on uniform and hair standards.
Cairns said “extravagant and unusual haircuts”, including dreadlocks and braids, were not permitted as per the school rules.
“Students with long hair must have it tied back. Hair should be the student’s natural colour, not dyed or streaked,” he posted on the school’s Facebook page.
The requirements were outlined to the students at an assembly last term and again on the first day back.
Taking the matter to Twitter, Tairāwhiti resident Tina Ngata, an indigenous and human rights advocate, called the school’s words and actions “straight racist”.
Ngata said she would be writing about it to the Human Rights and Race Relations Commission.
In a statement to the Herald, Cairns said the school received an email from a member of the public, addressed to the principal and the board of rrustees, requesting the board review its policy and rules regarding hair.
“As with all correspondence addressed directly to the board, this letter will be considered as a matter of process at the next board meeting, as requested. In the interests of our school rules remaining relevant and appropriate, we feel that it is timely to review aspects of the rule on haircuts.
“As part of our enrollment and transition into school, when meeting with every family we discuss and provide a copy of our school rules, values and code of behaviour. Any individual circumstances are addressed during this process.”
Cairns said the school regularly clarifies the rules with our students and school community.
“The current rules allow for long hair, so long as it is tied back or up, in line with some traditional practice.”
The board of trustees also has a regular schedule of policy review, in which the entire school community have the opportunity to be consulted and have input.
“Any feedback on current societal standards of cultural inclusion and identity as they relate to the uniform and dress code policy are important and will be considered within the policy review process,” Cairns said.
The Ministry of Education Te Tai Whenua (Central) hautū (leader) Jocelyn Mikaere said the school’s board of trustees must not discriminate against students’ culture or religion.
“Boards of Trustees have the authority to make and apply school rules on a wide range of matters including uniforms and appearance. This can range from hairstyles, clothing and tattoos,” she said.
Mikaere said the ministry did not require schools to inform it about their rules, however, “we do expect them to communicate the school rules clearly to parents and caregivers and require schools to consult if they are proposing any changes”.
The Human Rights Commission said while school boards had the discretion to set policies as they see fit, these policies must be consistent with New Zealand human rights law and consistent with Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
“The Human Rights Act (HRA) prohibits discrimination in education where a student is treated less favourably because of one or more of the 13 prohibited grounds under the Human Rights Act,” acting Race Relations Commissioner Saunoamaali’i Karanin Sumeo told the Herald.
“Hairstyle on its own is not a prohibited ground. However, if schools restrict students from wearing their hair in a way that connects to their cultural, ethnic or religious identity, then it could be grounds for discrimination under the Act.”
The High Court has found that schools need to carefully consider whether any rule regarding hair or appearance would breach a student’s right to freedom of expression under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or breach their right to dignity and individual autonomy, the spokesperson said.
Then Year 12 student Lucan Battison famously won a court case against Hastings’ St John’s College after being suspended for refusing to cut his long locks.
The High Court ruled that the decision to suspend him was unlawful and the school’s rule over hair length was vague and uncertain.